Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sodawala, Javed
- Evaluation of Malocclusion Traits Associated with Ankyloglossia: A Pilot Study
Abstract Views :143 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Rungta College Of Dental Science and Research, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, IN
1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Rungta College Of Dental Science and Research, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh, IN
Source
Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), Vol 32, No 1-2 (2018), Pagination: 16-20Abstract
Context: Although the role of ankyloglossia as an etiologic factor in the development of the malocclusion is well established, the guidelines for its clinical examination are still not clear especially in adult subjects. Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate dento-skeletal characteristics in patients with ankyloglossia and to correlate ankyloglossia with various malocclusion traits. Settings and Design: Descriptive cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: Fifty patients were divided into two groups using Kotlow’s method: without ankyloglossia (group WA) and ankyloglossia (group A). Five skeletal characteristics- SNA, SNB, ANB, GoGn-SN and five dental characteristics - Class of malocclusion, crowding, spacing, overjet and overbite were assessed. Statistical analysis used: Independent t test was used to compare skeletal and dental characteristics between group WA and A. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine interrelationship between ankyloglossia and skeletal and dental characteristics. The level of significance was set at .05. Results: There were statistically significant differences between group WA and group A with respect to SNA, SNB and overjet (P<0.05). Also, a significant positive correlation was seen between ankyloglossia and Class of malocclusion. (r=0.501, P<0.05). Conclusions: This study suggests patients with ankyloglossia have increased overjet with more retrognathic maxilla and mandible as compared to patients without ankyloglossia.Keywords
Ankyloglossia, Kotlow’s Method, MaloccusionReferences
- Olivi G, Signore A, Olivi M, Genovese MD. Lingual frenectomy: Functional evaluation and new therapeutical approach. Eur J Dent. 2012;13:101–106.
- Northcutt ME. The lingual frenum. J Clin Orthod. 2009;43(9):557–655. PMid:19904047
- Segan LM, Stephenson S, Dawes M. Feldman. Prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of ankyloglossia. Methodologic review. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53:1027–1033.
- Kloars T. Familial ankyloglossia (tongue tie). Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryng. 2007;71:1321–1324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.05.018. PMid:17588677
- Jang SJ, Cha BK, Ngan P, Choi DS, Lee SK, Jang I. Relationship between the lingual frenulum and craniofacial morphology in adults. Am J Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139:e361–e367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.017. PMid:21435544
- Defabianis P. Ankyloglossia and its influence on maxillary and mandibular development. (A seven year follow-up case report). Funct Orthod 2000;17:25–33. PMid:11307269
- Meenakshi S, Jagannathan N. Assessment of lingual frenulum lengths in skeletal malocclusion. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:202–204. PMid:24783137. PMCid:PMC4003643
- Kotlow LA. Ankyloglossia (tongue-tie): A diagnostic and treatment quandary. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(4):259–262. PMid:10635253
- Kotlow LA. Oral diagnosis of oral frenum attachments in neonates and infants: Evaluation and treatment of the maxillary and lingual frenum using the Erbium: YAG laser. Journal Pediatric Dental Care. 2004;10(3):11–13.
- Srinivasan B, Chitharanjan AB. Skeletal and dental characteristics in subjects with ankyloglossia. Prog Orthod. 2013;14:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/2196-1042-14-44. PMid:24326143. PMCid:PMC4384905
- Moss ML, Rankow RM. The role of the functional matrix in mandibular growth. Angle Orthod. 1968;38:95–103. PMid:5239131
- Pompéiaa LE, Ilinskya RS, Ortolania CL, Júnior KF. Ankyloglossia and its influence on growth and development of the stomatognathic system. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017;35(2):216–221
- Proffit WR. Equilibrium theory revisited: factors influencing position of the teeth. Angle Orthod. 1978;48:175–186. PMid:280125
- Fletcher SG, Meldrum JR. Lingual function and relative length of the lingual frenulum. J Speech Hear Res. 1968;11:382–390. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1102.382
- Sepet E, Yildiz C, Erdem AP, Ikikarakayali G, Gorken FN, Kuru S. Relationship between mandibular incisor irregularity and type of occlusion in ankyloglossia. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2015;13:59–63. PMid:24914432
- Assessment of Malocclusion and Orthodontic Treatment Need Among Hearing and Speech Impaired Children
Abstract Views :236 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Javed Sodawala
1,
Nidhi Agrawal
1,
Sumit Gandhi
1,
Shaheen Hamdani
1,
Swalpa Agrawal
1,
Harsha Malhotra
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Rungta College of Dental Sciences & Research, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences and Ayush University of Chhattisgarh, Bhilai - 490024, Chhattisgarh, IN
1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Rungta College of Dental Sciences & Research, Pt. Deendayal Upadhyay Memorial Health Sciences and Ayush University of Chhattisgarh, Bhilai - 490024, Chhattisgarh, IN
Source
Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), Vol 32, No 1-2 (2018), Pagination: 21-26Abstract
Aim: Children with special needs are prone to poor oral health due to their potential sensory, motor and intellectual disturbances. The purpose of this study was to evaluate type and severity of malocclusion and assess orthodontic treatment need in hearing and speech impaired children. Materials and Methods: Sixty-seven hearing and speech impaired children aged 7-14 years studying in special schools in Bhilai and Durg were included in this study. The Dental Health Component (DHC) and Aesthetic Component (AC) of Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) were recorded by one examiner. Data were analysed using student’s t-test and chi-square test at a level of significance of .05. Results: According to AC, 61.2% children had no/little need, 35.8% had moderate need and 3% had great need of orthodontic treatment. According to DHC, 35.8% children had no/little treatment need, 43.3% had moderate need and 20.9% had great treatment need. Chi-square test showed a highly significant gender difference (P<.001), according to gender based DHC grade. Also, a highly significant difference between patient’s perception and orthodontist’s opinion for both AC and DHC (P<.001). Conclusion: The patient’s perception and orthodontist’s opinion differed for assessment of malocclusion of hearing and speech impaired children. There was a moderate need of orthodontic treatment in these children of Bhilai and Durg.Keywords
Hearing and Speech Impaired, Orthodontic Treatment Need, IOTNReferences
- Ciger S, Akan S. Occlusal characteristics of deaf-mute individuals in the Turkish population. Eur J Dent. 2010; 4:128–136. PMid:20396442. PMCid:PMC2853818
- Chaushu S, Becker A. Behaviour management needs for the orthodontic treatment of children with disabilities. Eur J Orthod. 2000; 22:143–149. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/22.2.143. PMid:10822887
- Avasthi K. Oral health status of sensory impaired children in Delhi and Gurgaon. Int J Dent Clin. 2011; 3:21–23.
- Jain M, Bharadwaj SP, Kaira LS, Chopra D, Prabu D, Kulkarni S. Oral health status and treatment need among institutionalised hearing-impaired and blind children and young adults in Udaipur, India. A comparative study. Oral Health Dent Management. 2013; 12:41–49. PMid:23474580
- Waldman HB, Perlman SP, Swerdloff M. Orthodontics and the population with special needs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000; 118:14–17. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2000.105236.PMid:10893467
- Waldman HB. Special pediatric population groups and their use of dental services. J Dent Child. 1989; 56:211–215. PMid:2524512
- Brook H, Shaw WC. The development of an orthodontic treatment priority index. Eur J Orthod.1989; 11:309–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999. PMid:2792220
- Bhowate R, Dubey A. Dentofacial changes and oral health status in mentally challenged children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2005; 23:71–73. https://doi.org/10.4103/09704388.16445.PMid:16012208
- Nowak AJ. Dental care for the handicapped patient – past, present, future. In: Nowak AJ, editor. Dentistry for the Handicapped patient. 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby;1976. p.3–20.
- Sarheed M, Bedi R, Hunt NP. Orthodontic treatment need and self-perception of 11-16 year old Saudi Arabian children with a sensory impairment attending special schools. J Orthod. 2003; 30:39–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/ ortho/30.1.39. PMid:12644606
- Desai M, Messer LB, Calache H. A study of the dental treatment needs of children with disabilities in Melbourne, Aust Dent J. 2001; 46:41–50. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00273.x. PMid:11355240
- Soni S, Aggarwal P, Dua V. The use of Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) in children with special needs. Int J Contemporary Dentistry. 2011; 2:72–79.
- Maurya R. Determination of dentofacial deformities & orthodontic treatment requirement in differentially abled children using IOTN. Int J Dent Oral Health. 2015; 1(3):114–118.
- Vellappally S, Gardens SJ, Al Kheraif AA, Krishna M, Babu S, et al. The prevalence of malocclusion and its association with dental caries among 12-18-year-old disabled adolescents. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14:1–7.
- Nguyen SM, Nguyen MK, Saag M, Jagomagi T. The need for orthodontic treatment among Vietnamese school children and young adults. Int J Dent. 2014; 4:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/132301. PMid:25136367 PMCid:PMC4130147
- Thakur R. Assessment of Severity of Malocclusion and Orthodontic Treatment needs in School children of Bhilai, using Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) - A Perspective Study [Thesis]. Rungta College of Dental Sciences and Research; 2013.
- Sharma J, Sharma RD. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need for children in Moradabad, North India. Oral Health Dent Management. 2014; 13:1–6.
- Comparison of Tensile Bond Strength of Permasoft® and GC Reline Soft® Resilient Liners after Denture Base Surface Pretreatment
Abstract Views :116 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dental College, Rungta College of Dental Science and Research, Bhilai – 490024, IN
1 Dental College, Rungta College of Dental Science and Research, Bhilai – 490024, IN
Source
Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (India Section), Vol 36, No 1 (2022), Pagination: 16-22Abstract
Objectives: The surface treatment of intaglio denture base surface by sandblasting followed by Methyl Methacrylate (MMA) monomer might enhance the bond strength of resilient liners. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare Tensile Bond Strength (TBS) of two resilient liners after surface treatment of Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) resins by sandblasting and MMA monomer. Materials and Methods: One hundred and sixty PMMA resin blocks were randomly divided into eight groups of 20 blocks each based on type of resilient long term liner used (P=PermaSoft and G=GC Reline Soft) and the surface treatment performed (C=untreated Controls, S=Sandblasted, M=MMA monomer treated and SM=Sandblasted and MMA monomer treated: Group PC (PermaSoft untreated Controls), PS (PermaSoft Sandblasted), PM (PermaSoft MMA monomer treated) and PSM (PermaSoft Sandblasted and MMA monomer treated, GC (GC Reline Soft untreated Controls), GS (GC Reline Soft Sandblasted), GM (GC Reline Soft MMA monomer treated) and GSM (GC Reline Soft Sandblasted and MMA monomer treated). Each specimen was prepared by joining two PMMA resin blocks having standard dimensions of 10 × 10 × 40mm with either of the resilient liner of thickness of 10 × 10 × 3mm. The prepared 80 specimens were subjected to testing of TBS by universal testing machine. Also, the types of failure, whether adhesive, cohesive or mixed, were determined by stereomicroscope. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post hoc test was used to compare TBS of different surface treatment group with similar resilient liner. Student T-test was used to compare TBS of different resilient liner with similar surface treatment. The level of significance was set at 0.05. Results: There was highly significant difference in mean TBS of four surface treatment subgroups within both the groups (P<0.001). The Tukey post hoc test showed significant difference (P<0.05) between group PC=0.837 ± 0.120MPa and PSM=1.104 ± 0.234MPa; and GS=1.304 ± 0.261MPa and GM=2.053 ± 0.784MPa and highly significant difference (P<0.001) between group PS=0.741 ± 0.103 MPa) and PSM=1.104 ± 0.234MPa); and GS=1.304 ± 0.261MPa) and GSM=2.176 ± 0.262MPa. The mean TBS of GC Reline Soft was significantly higher (<0.001) than PermaSoft in various surface treatment groups. The overall modes of failures were predominantly cohesive type (63.75%) followed by mixed type (18.75%) and adhesive type (17.50%). Conclusions: All groups tested had mean bond strength values greater than the minimum acceptable standard (0.44MPa) for clinical application. MMA monomer treatment alone or in combination with sandblasting resulted in increase of the mean TBS whereas sandblasting resulted in decrease of the mean TBS of both PermaSoft and GC Reline Soft specimens.Keywords
Denture Liners, Mode of Bond Failure, Surface Pretreatment, Tensile Bond StrengthReferences
- Khanna A, Bhatnagar VM, Karani JT, Madria K, Mistry S. A comparative evaluation of shear bond strength between two commercially available heat cured resilient liners and denture base resin with different surface treatments. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9:ZC30–4. https://doi. org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/11504.5892. PMid:26155558. PMCid:PMC4484150
- Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S. Soft lining materials – A review. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent. 1995; 3:163–74.
- Phoenix RD. Denture base resins. In Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials, 11th ed.; Anusavice K, Ed.; Saunders: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2003; p. 750–2.
- Chladek GR, Żmudzki J, Kasperski J. Long-term soft denture lining materials. Materials. 2014; 7:5816–42. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma7085816. PMid:28788163. PMCid:PMC5456172
- Surapaneni H, Ariga P, Haribabu R, Shankar YR, Kumar VH, Attili S. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength between silicon soft liners and processed denture base resin conditioned by three modes of surface treatment: an invitro study. J Ind Prosthodont Soc. 2013; 13:274–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0235-5. PMid:24431747. PMCid:PMC3732717
- Kulkarni RS, Parkhedkar R. The effect of denture base surface pretreatments on bond strengths of two long term resilient liners. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011; 3:16–9. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.1.16. PMid:21503188. PMCid:PMC3076568
- Swapna C, Hareesh MT, Renjith M, Ahmed A, Abraham IA, Gopinathan M. An evaluation of the effect of surface treatment on the bond strength of soft denture liners. J Int Oral Health. 2016; 8:922–6.
- Garcia RCMR, Leon BLT, Oliveira VMB, Cury AADB. Effect of denture cleanser on weight, surface roughness and tensile bond strength of two resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:489–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-3913(03)00126-4
- Kawano F, Tada N, Nagao K, Matsumoto N. The influence of soft lining materials on pressure distribution. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 65:567–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 3913(91)90301-C
- Khan Z, Martin J, Collard S. Adhesion characteristics of visible light cured denture base material bonded to resilient lining materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1989; 62:196–200. https:// doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90313-2
- Emmer T J, Vaidyanathan J, Vaidyanathan TK. Bond strength of permanent soft denture liners bonded to the denture base. J Prosthet Dent. 1995; 74:595–601. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80311-7
- El-Hadary A, Drummond JL. Comparitive study of water sorption, solubility and tensile bond strength of two soft lining materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83:356–61. https:// doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70140-5
- Pinto JRR, Mesquita MF, Henriques GEP, de Arruda Nobilo MA. Effect of thermocycling on bond strength and elasticity of four long term soft denture liners. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88:516–21. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128953. PMid:12474002
- Mutluay MM, Ruyter IE. Evaluation of bond strength of soft relining materials to denture base polymers. Dent Mater. 2007; 23:1373–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental. 2006.11.014. PMid:17222898
- McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials. 2002; 23:1347–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0142-9612(01)00253-8
- Madan N, Dutta K. Evaluation of tensile bond strength of heat cure and auto-polymerizing silicone-based resilient denture liners before and after thermocycling. Ind J Dent Res. 2012; 23:64–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970- 9290.99041. PMid:22842252
- Minami H, Suzuki S, Ohashi H, Kurashige H, Tanaka T. Effect of surface treatment on the bonding of an autopolymerizing soft denture liner to a denture base resin. Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17:297–301.
- Gopal KV, Padmaja BJ, Reddy NR, Reddy BM, Babu NS, Sunil M. Comparison and evaluation of tensile bond strength of two soft liners to the denture base resin with different surface textures: An in vitro study. J NTR Uni Health Sci. 2014; 3:102–6. https://doi.org/10.4103/2277- 8632.134850
- Sarac YS, Sarac D, Kulunk T, Kulunk S. The effect of chemi¬cal surface treatments of different denture base resins on the shear bond strength of denture repair. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94:259–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent. 2005.05.024. PMid:16126078
- Leles CR, Machado AL, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET, Pavarina AC. Bonding strength between a hard chairside reline resin and a denture base material as influenced by surface treatment. J Oral Rehabil. 2001; 28:1153–7. https:// doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2001.00786.x. PMid:11874516
- Al-Athel MS, Jagger RG. Effect of test method on the bond strength of a silicone resilient denture lining material. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76:535–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0022-3913(96)90014-1
- Vallittu PK, Lassila VP, Lappalainen R. Wetting the repair surface with methyl methacrylate affects the transverse strength of repaired heat-polymerized resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1994; 72:639–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 3913(94)90297-6
- Kulak-Ozkan Y, Sertgoz A, Gedik H. Effect of thermocycling on tensile bond strength of six silicone based resilient denture liners. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 89:303–10. https://doi. org/10.1067/mpr.2003.41. PMid:12644808
- Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six denture liners to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 68:368–71. https://doi. org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90347-D